Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Putting the pieces together

I had grand plans for this evening; few of them got accomplished. In particular I had planned to finish up my writeup on last year's trip to New York so that I could get back to catching up on the more "normal" blog entries, which don't take as much time, and tear through those.

Instead, I conducted a bit of an audio experiment, and thought I'd write it up while it's still fresh on my mind. I'll get to that in a minute.

First, a little background on Sonos. Sonos makes several components which comprise a system for wireless playback of music from a computer, distributed to multiple "ZonePlayers", which can act as either a source for an amplifier or powered speakers (ZP 90, $349 each), or a source with a built-in amplifier to drive traditional passive speakers (ZP 120), depending on the model. These units are tied together nicely by a remote control with a color LCD screen and an iPod-ish scroll wheel ($399). I've not used one myself, but apparently they've done a nice job with the interface.

So you take one of the ZP units and wire it up to your home network, and then add additional ZPs to various rooms in your house, and you can have the same thing play in each room, or different music in each room, whatever you like. There's some other cool tricks it can do, like using a subscription to a streaming music service like Rhapsody to play music that's not on your computer. There's some things I consider technical downsides, like the fact that instead of riding your existing wireless network, the units set up their own, but that's just nitpicking.

They seem to be doing a pretty good business, because Logitech's SlimDevices has a new product named SqueezeBox Duet, which comprises a Squeezebox Receiver ($199) analogous to the ZP 90, and a remote control similar to the Sonos unit ($299). If you'll recall, I have one of their $299 Squeezebox 3 units for my bedroom stereo, which similarly plays back music over the network, but includes a rather less advanced (monochrome, relatively low resolution) display on the unit itself, and a regular, screen-less remote. It's a nice little piece of gear, I must admit.

So let's say you wanted to wire up your a existing home theater setup and bedroom stereo for wireless playback from your computer. Going the Sonos route, you'd buy two of their ZP 90s and one remote, for $1100. You could probably bring that down a bit by buying one of their handy bundles.

Alternatively, you could go the SlimDevices route, getting two receivers and one remote for $700, a potentially substantial savings. .

At this point, I'll mention that Apple has a little device called the Airport Express (AX). It's a rather anonymous looking device, not much bigger than most of Apple's laptop power adapters. Its chief function is to act as a wireless router, but it's got two bonus features: it can act as a print server, and, of more interest to me, it can act as a wireless receiver of digital audio transmitted from a copy of iTunes. It retails at $99, or $59 if you grab a clearance last-generation model which lacks 802.11n wireless networking.

So for half the price of the Logitech unit, or just under a third the price of the Sonos, you get fairly similar functionality. You can even have different computers playing over different AX units, or have one computer play over multiple AXes simultaneously. Apple's close to giving you the pieces to make your own Sonos system at a fraction of the price. What you miss out on is the cool remote controls that have nice interfaces and pretty album art. You could use a laptop for this purpose, but it'd be both bulky and expensive.

But with a completely tossed off bit of software for the iPhone/iPod touch, suddenly, Apple has a wireless remote that looks to be the equivalent of the Logitech and Sonos units. It's called, simply, "Remote", and is a free download. The app can browse any iTunes libraries on your network, and play them over the computers themselves or any AXes on the network. So if you already own an iPhone, you get the functionality of the $299 Logitech or $399 Sonos units. If you don't, buy an 8 GB iPod touch for $299 (or $199 refurb if you want to be cheap).

So all of a sudden, Apple offers a system for $500 ($320 if you bargain hunt) that competes with a $700 Logitech setup and a $1100 Sonos setup. Pretty cool for a company that's not really in the hi-fi business.

Speaking of which, there are bound to be some downsides to getting audio out of a device as multipurpose as the AX, and that comes from the fact that it uses a relatively low performance digital-analog converter. But... the AX's analog output doubles as a digital output, letting you take advantage of a better DAC if you have one (and if you have a home theater receiver, you already do).

At this point, you're probably asking, how does this affect you, Ward? Well, I'll get to that in part 2.

Labels: , ,



Monday, August 04, 2008

Rental car; Harry Potter; Parent meeting; Trip preparations

So much for not hitting the "year behind" mark. Well, shit. Maybe I can knock out a couple posts tonight. I've done a good job of keeping staying on top of my daily reading, so that's one less thing vying for my time, so I'm going to shoot for picking up the pace.

7/23/07

Thanks to out fortune getting the California excursion paid for and getting airline vouchers to take care of our flights to New York, not only could I afford the new iPhone, but also to have some scratchy nastiness on my car fixed.

So, took the car to the good ol' body shop, where they now know and take care of me (this was round 3), and then got a ride to Enterprise to pick up my rental car as paid for by insurance. There was a brief time when I was worried I'd have to drive a PT Cruiser around, but thankfully got a pretty nice little red Nissan Sentra.

The Sentra was my first chance to drive a car with Continuously Variable Transmission. It's a pretty nice system, actually, probably great for most of the driving public. No jerky shifts, etc. It was creepy getting used to it, just because the car kept not shifting (or, rather, kept shipping imperceptibly) when you expected to. The "gearing", such as it was, was not as agressive as I might like, but hell, it's all software, it could easily be tweaked.

Now I just need to try out a dual-clutch system and my tour of new transmission technologies will be complete.

It was a decent little car, I suppose, probably a nice alternative to a Corolla. Didn't drive as well as the Mazda or, say, a Civic, but it was pleasant enough.

I'd passed up being home to receive my copy of the final Harry Potter book to attend the wedding the previous weekend, so Monday evening was my first chance to really dig into the book, so dig I did...

7/24/07

Band practice, then more Harry Potter reading.

7/25/07

During the days of this week, I snuck off several times for "lunch", found a quiet, comfortable spot, and got some Harry Potter reading done.

Picked up an iPhone case to protect my new baby during the new york trip. Dinner and Sopranos after that.

7/26/07

Got at haircut for the wedding. Paul, my stylist, referred to it as "tuxedo hair". It looked good, I have to say.

7/27/07

So, Cindy and I had been dating almost 2 years, and I still hadn't met her parents, who live in town. Of course, that's in keeping with the rest of our relationship. We weren't officially "together" until we'd been dating about 9 months; it was around the 1 year mark that my parents found out she existed, and around the 1.5 mark that they actually met her. We move at a leisurely pace, I suppose, so it wasn't too sad that I was just then meeting them.

We met them for dinner in honor of Cindy's birthday at a Chinese place out west on Bellaire. Food was good; must have been pretty authentic. Thankfully Linn, Cindy's brother who I'd spent some time with, was there. Cindy's parents were very nice to me, but I was surprised by now much of a language barrier there was. I definitely had trouble (and still do) understanding them (and more or less vice versa). But all in all, it was a pretty successful meeting.

7/28/07

Various errands, laundry, and so forth, preparing for our New York trip. I had planned to take Cindy out for a nice dinner for her birthday but she had work to finish up before the trip, so that didn't happen. We did make it to a party at the MFAH and then got some drinks at Rudz afterwards.

7/29/07

Somehow I'd gotten the crazy notion in my head that if I worked hard, my paper could be submitted while I was in New York. Idiocy, in retrospect. But anyway, did that, got packed.

Labels: , , , , ,



Monday, June 30, 2008

Checking out the iPhone; Farewell to David; Dallas

7/9

Made my first trip to check out the iPhone at the Apple Store, and it was everything I'd dreamed it would be. What with the California trip having been all but picked up by my funding agency, and the resulting air travel voucher, I was in a pretty good place financially. So I started thinking about the logistics of getting out of my T-mobile contract, selling my Blackberry, and acquiring an iPhone.

After getting back, Cindy & I made our airplane ticket purchases and watched some Sopranos.

7/10

Band practice, followed by picking up some Whataburger on the way home. Yum.

7/11

Sometimes-collaborator, frequent annoyance David from the lab decided to plan his going away party while the boss was out of the country, since he's kind of a dick like that. That had the side effect that, sadly, the event was not on the lab's dime. Anyway, we hit Gingerman after work for some beer, then Nit Noi for some Thai. Somehow, I was the group's expert for Thai food and so did the ordering.

Afterwards, Cindy & I scooped Will up from Baker Street to catch the new Harry Potter, which I recall being nice enough.

7/12

Grocery shopping and then the Sopranos. Super exciting evening.

7/13

I took the day off and headed up to Dallas for my annual visit to see Bryan. I got in, checked out their awesome house in the Lower Greenville neighborhood, played some Wii Tennis, and then Phil met up with us and we walked up to Blue... Mesa? (help me out, Bryan) for Tex-Mex and margs. Then, more walking (I do like being able to walk places—no worries about having to drive home and such) up to the Granada theater to catch a solid set by Centro-Matic. I'm sure we grabbed some more drinks somewhere else afterwards (or maybe not) before we headed back to Bryan's place.

7/14

Bryan and I started the day with some Wii Tennis before grabbing lunch at a Mediterranean place (again, Bryan, remind me). Bryan had wanted to show me Penzey's Spices, which was pretty sweet, and then we headed back to his place.

What came next was a revelation. Bryan had gotten some beers from Thom: the magical lambic variety known as gueuze. I was familiar with the fruit-flavored lambics, but not this wonderfully sour beer. Bryan had four bottles that we worked our way through. The first was Lindemann's Gueuze, which I think is kind of a dumbed down version of the style, with some extra sweetness to cover the sour flavors. Next we tried their Cuvée Rene, which is a pretty faithful representation, and I loved it. In addition to the sourness there was a nice dark roasted nut flavor behind it. There were two more which I found pretty similar to the Cuvée Rene (Bryan, more help...). The Cuvée is the only one (well, and the Gueuze) I can get in Texas, and I've since taken to stocking a few bottles.

In a very lucky coincidence, Nick and Alison happened to be rolling through town that same evening. Nick caught up with us during our beer tasting and joined in... and brandished his new iPhone. I was, of course, jealous. We went out for a great Indian dinner (Bryan...) and Alison very patiently put up with us catching up, before they had to be on their way.

7/15

We grabbed some lunch (the details escape me... Bryan?) before doing some shopping at Good Records and then I headed back to Houston. My notes specify that I went to Buffalo Wild Wings that night... presumably with Cindy.

Labels: , , , , ,



Thursday, April 17, 2008

Tweets for Today

  • 11:45 Bah. Committee meeting tomorrow. Must finish presentation... #
  • 12:01 Pitchfork's new fonts: difficult to read at chosen size, exacerbated by using serif for heads and sans for body, rather than vice versa. #
  • 12:03 Body text is Calibri; head text is Cambria. I need per-site font settings. #
  • 15:51 Made mistake of taking iBuds on the shuttle instead of Ultimate Ears. Regretting. Too many people talking engine noise. #
  • 21:37 Somebody thinks they're clever, and they're right: bg5000.tumblr.com/post/31854880 #
  • 21:37 Did you know Jack Handey was real? www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/books/04/15/books.jack.handey.ap/index.html #
  • 21:43 Seems like Jack Handey and Douglas Adams had use similar techniques to construct their sentences to comedic effect. #
  • 21:49 "Eldest children are punished more". I knew it! tinyurl.com/yvrra8/news/2008/04/16/npunish116.xml #
  • 22:52 Dairy Queen ad narrator sounds like Dubya, or at least a Dubya impersonator. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , , , ,



Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Tweets for Today

  • 11:05 ACL '08 lineup: meh. twurl.nl/5br5z6 #
  • 12:18 Boss "suggested" I come to the genetics seminar. Hate it when that happens. Better things to do plus bad signal in here. #
  • 15:08 Annoyed, for some reason. Construction in adjacent rooms not helping. #
  • 15:25 Monster Cable, you just got served: twurl.nl/hnyhrj #
  • 15:31 That letter to Monster Cable just brightened my day. I read the whole thing. #
  • 15:44 PowerPoint 2008, though less ugly than the previous version, is also less fast. I am undecided which compromise I prefer. #
  • 16:15 Oh Excel, why won't you let me make a *series* of pie charts, formatted identically? Sometimes one pie just isn't enough. #
  • 16:35 Finding the Raconteurs album aurally fatiguing. They may be professional, but whoever mixed it wasn't. Low dynamic range, I think. #
  • 16:46 The last White Stripes album had some bad clipping. Why be all anal about analog recording and then screw it up in mastering? #
  • 17:05 Up next, Love As Laughter's vintage "The Greks Bring Gifts" which I finally tracked down. Contains "Singing Sores Make Perfect Swords". #
  • 17:06 Which sounds lo-fi in a My Bloody Valentine haze of sound sort of way. #
  • 17:09 Maybe also in a Times New Viking way too. There's a line that was crossed, somewhere. #
  • 17:47 This LaL album is all over the place. The MBV-ish tracks are good. The more garage-ish tracks are iffy and a bit too demo-ish. #
  • 18:04 Mmm... Grado SR60s never fair to satisfy. An amazing pair of headphones. #
  • 18:20 Next, Silkworm's "Firewater". Good stuff. Better than "Libertine", close to son-of-Silkworm Bottomless Pit's great "Hammer of the Gods". #
  • 19:22 So far, I'm iffy on this Why? album. But it seems that music listened to and work accomplished on any given day are correlated. #
  • 19:46 Why's not bad, but I keep feeling like I have more rewarding things to be listening to. I may come around to it, though. #
  • 00:48 Ever wonder about the &? www.adobe.com/type/topics/theampersand.html #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , , ,



Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Tweets for Today

  • 12:01 Monday. Bad: have to work on CM presentation. Good: free Goode Co. BBQ after class; boss has not yet returned. #
  • 12:21 Monday. Ugly: guy in lab's fiancé has temporarily taken up residence in lab; they whisper to each other a lot. #
  • 14:41 This will end well, too. Blockbuster is on a roll: twurl.nl/0ife8j #
  • 15:39 Time to trek over to Rice... #
  • 16:09 Jack White is a *professional*. New Raconteurs album may be more artisansl than artistic, but I marvel at the sheer competency on display. #
  • 16:10 Now this is a beautiful spring day. Ever so slightly crisp, sunny, some nice wind. Beautiful day to tackle a couple walks. #
  • 16:51 Microsoft was not a competitor to Compaq. Please refrain from asking asinine questions, classmate. #
  • 16:53 Lesson learned: Compaq, like M$, succeeded on the pure dumb luck of being in the right place at the right time. #
  • 23:25 Bad neck ache ruined my afternoon/evening. Just woke up from a very therapeutic nap. #
  • 01:53 Shoe shopping online is about 100x less annoying than having to do it in person. As is true of most forms of online shopping. #
  • 02:31 2 days of having no tabs in my browser at the end of the day (at least at home). This is down from ~100 tabs usually waiting to be read. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , ,



Saturday, April 12, 2008

Tweets for Today

  • 09:57 Thank God for wireless at the car dealership. Though I always feel a little dirty that it's filtered: no mazda3forums.com for me. #
  • 10:03 Wait. Penny Arcade blocked. This just got worse. #
  • 10:16 And Houstonist is blocked. Well, it's not that good anyway. #
  • 10:19 & Joystiq. Nothing fun allowed, apparently. #
  • 10:48 Pitchfork blocked. Now I'm really feeling oppressed. Thank God for the iPhone... #
  • 13:31 Having lunch with 'Brina. #
  • 15:20 And now, to try to get some work done. #
  • 17:21 I realized last night that I just don't get or give enough drunk dials anymore. #
  • 18:13 Okkervil River are a blessing. #
  • 18:53 Friday and Battlestar Galactica. What a great combination. #
  • 01:07 Wow. Didn't realize how much I missed the office until it came back. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , , , ,



Friday, April 11, 2008

Tweets for Today

  • 13:28 The mystery of the unknown key has beensolved. It's to the complex's pedestrian gate. No wonder I didn't recognize it. I've never used it! #
  • 14:10 Hah. This will go well. tinyurl.com/6krmrq #
  • 15:17 Cool houses: tinyurl.com/5voudp #
  • 15:50 Preparing for thesis committee meeting. Worst 2 parts of my year. God willing, this is my second-to-last one. #
  • 17:38 First take on Someone Still Loves You Boris Yeltsin's new album: too damned slick. #
  • 18:51 I'm glad that on my iPhone, Mobile Safari no longer causes the iPod app to crash with great frequency. #
  • 03:01 Enough No More Heroes for one night; I suppose it's bed time. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , , , , ,



Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Tweets for Today

Daily Twitterings:
  • 13:17 So Walt *doesn't* know when the next iPhone comes out? tinyurl.com/3pausx #
  • 17:22 Feeling patio-ish. #
  • 17:31 Signal is always bad in this one room... #
  • 23:55 So *that's* what rancid peanut butter tastes like. Date on the jar said best if sold by 10/06. Which, to be fair, it probably was. #
  • 02:37 3.5 years later, I finally finish Pikmin. Now back to all the other games I haven't finished. Zelda, you're next. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , , ,



Monday, April 07, 2008

Tweets for Today

Daily Twitterings:
  • 14:13 Patio or balcony? Light or dark? Flood risk or no? Slightly cramped or slightly spacious? Decisions, decisions... #
  • 14:14 Not sure why, but I *love* leftovers. Maybe because they're already prepared and paid for. Yay Pappasito's grilled platter. #
  • 19:43 Finally, somebody addresses the question of new iPhones and the FCC: tinyurl.com/4jycry #
  • 19:45 Accomplished: picked up comics, went by Sam's. Did not: pick apartment, sign lease, wash car. Pending: school stuff. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , ,



Saturday, April 05, 2008

Tweets for Today

Daily Twitterings:
  • 11:35 Vegan cooking is like trying to drive somewhere only making left turns: you can do it, but it's sort of silly. #
  • 11:36 I was referred to last night as a beer expert. I'm honored but it's overstating things quite a bit. #
  • 12:18 Papa John's thin crust is ~5x better than their regular crust. But regular *does* have garlic butter. #
  • 12:37 "Acquired" very nice pilsner glass and wheat beer glass from bar last night. Brought them $300 of business so I don't feel guilty. #
  • 15:14 Take that link and rickroll.it ! #
  • 15:15 Sadly Nick and I have discovered that fuck.it is registered. #
  • 15:44 Ah, crap. Thao & Xiu Xiu are playing tonight at the Orange Show, but I'm already commiteed to hosting a Battlestar Galactica viewing party. #
  • 16:14 Thank God for webcasts. Too rainy to walk to Rice today. #
  • 16:15 Stupid QuickTime player won't stay maximized on my second monitor. #
  • 16:40 OK, too much math in this talk. #
  • 17:30 Battlestar Galactica is back tonight! #
  • 02:39 Playing around with Pwnage. Nothing exciting so far, except that I've proven to myself that I won't brick my iPhone. Living on the edge! #
  • 04:00 iPhone does look awfully sexy displaying terminal text while booting. Wonder if there's a verbose booting option hidden somewhere? #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter.

Labels: , , , , , , ,



Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Lossy

Absolutely fascinating article in Stereophile on lossy audio compression* (*Actual results may vary. Your definition of "fascinating" may vary from that of Ward). I've seen the subject explored before, but it's nice to see some actual data.

Of course, the flaw here is that it's only pure data, rather than any subjective reports from actual listening. Although I certainly prefer lossless encoding on my music, particularly when I am using my best gear for playback, lossy encoding is a useful tool for things like sampling new music, listening in the car, or loading a portable device of relatively limited memory (i.e. anything but an 80/160 gb iPod classic). I use it in the car and on the iPhone. I tend to think it's not nearly as bad as most of Stereophile's writers do, but when I really, really want to listen to music, give me the caffeinated version.

Real update coming soon* (*Actual results may vary. Your definition of "soon" may differ from that of Ward).

Labels: , ,



Thursday, March 06, 2008

Dinosaurs

And the IT execs still don't get it.

Apple: "Here's everything you asked for! And we made it even better!"
IT: "Sorry, we lied. We're really just too lazy, incompetent, and prejudiced to support your incredibly useful device."

I'll be glad when the current generation of IT people goes the way of the current generation of music industry people.

If I feel like it later I'll post a more detailed blurb of my thoughts on Apple's announcements today. Short term, I'm happy.

Labels: , ,



Fleet Foxes

Just a quick shout out to recent Pitchfork laudees Fleet Foxes.

Not only did they put on a kick ass show at Walter's last night opening for Blitzen Trapper (who were also good), but they get some extra cool points as well.

I went to buy their new EP, sound unheard, on the strength of their vocally harmonious 70s-ish folk rock, and the band member that sold me the EP not only offered to negotiate the price (thankfully I had no problem spending the $7 asked), but told me that if I was internet-savy, I should download the leak of their new album.

Which I would have done anyway. But it's good to see an artist recognize that I just want to hear the music, and have faith that if I like it, I'll buy it when the product itself.

Nice job, guys.

Labels: , ,



Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Shark jumped!



Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Shafted

Apple to loyal customers: "Drop dead."

Addendum, 9/10/2007: I'll expand on this a bit.

Technology both improves and gets cheaper over time. It's almost always true. I recognize this.

However, Apple's pretty predictable in terms of how frequently products get updates, when they get updated, and whether they just get better specs, or whether they are redesigned to some extent. Beyond that, especially with their "consumer electronics" items, i.e. iPods, prices rarely change; you're more likely to just see better capabilities at the same price point.

So if you buy something from Apple the day after it comes out, odds are that it won't be getting better for at least 6 months if not a year, and probably not any cheaper, but if there are price cuts the time frame is similar.

But in the case of the iPhone, after an unprecedented 2 months there was a 33% price drop. $200 off is huge, especially after Apple made it very clear that they didn't want to have a cell phone that gets given away in cereal boxes and such. It's still hard for me to believe.

So I took a gamble that six weeks ago was a good time to buy, and it wasn't.

Beyond those who argue that you can't bitch if you take a risk and it doesn't pan out (which is false), there are those who argue that if you can afford a $600 phone then $200 shouldn't matter to you. That's horseshit. I can manage to afford lots of nice things, but that's only because I try to maximize my money, and that includes not throwing away $200 whenever possible.

There's also the claim that two months of iPhone use and bragging rights were worth $200. To those people, I say that I would have gladly waited it out for $200.

Further, there's the issue of whether this price cut was planned or not. If it wasn't, well, that's the market. But if it was, Apple fleeced their best customers. Not only do they buy the most stuff (I've had 5 macs, 6 iPods, an iPhone, and countless software packages and accessories), but they also are influential in their friends' purchases (I'd have a little more money in the bank if I had a commission for every Mac and iPod I helped sell0. They also fleeced some of there newest customers, who they should be building a trusting relationship with.

So, thankfully, they practiced good business and apologized and gave use $100 in store credit. That's pretty good.

I'd prefer to have the $200. And in cash. That doesn't make me ungrateful. $100 and an apology went a long way toward restoring my faith in a company that makes great products and has yet to screw me over.

Those who complained about the early adopters like myself bitching either a) didn't pay $200 more than they should have or b) have enough money where $200 doesn't matter. Those people can all go fuck themselves.

Idiots who talk about something they can't understand aside, I want to thank Apple for making an overture toward their best customers, myself included. It's not perfect, but I'll take it. And willing or not, I'll probably figure out a way to get that other $100 out of you. Now I just have to figure out whether to take the sales tax from you or form the government.

Labels: , ,



Friday, June 15, 2007

The Bedroom Stereo

The Receiver


On the several occasions (most of which involved poker), I'd been over at Oliver's, I'd taken notice of the vintage receiver he had. I didn't remember it sounding very good. At first it was hooked up to some Bose speakers; they didn't sound good, which is not surprising since they're Bose. They might have been vintage, though, in which case they were probably pretty decent but maybe just getting old, or it might have been them not being set up properly. Later on he bought some active Sony speakers, which was almost assuredly even more of a step down.

Point being, the old thing had never really impressed me. So when he offered it to me because he was getting some sort of iPod speaker system...

Tangent: iPod speaker systems are rather silly things. Unless you're very space-challenged, or you're buying them to be portable, that is. Generally, they're bad speakers and bad electronics. With a few exceptions, you're better off with an iPod dock and a set of good computer speakers. But hell, people love 'em. Who am I to argue?

...I wasn't quite sure what I was going to do with it, but hell, if he was getting rid of it anyway, I'd at least be interested in playing around with. Especially since he said it had vacuum tubes.

Which it really didn't, as I discovered when I got it home and popped the top of the case off. This after lugging the surprisingly heavy thing up the stairs. It looked to be in pretty good shape, actually.

Rather than set it up in my living room with the main system, which would have been difficult for several reasons (tons of gear hooked up to my home theater receiver, wouldn't have worked well with my subwoofer, etc.), I set it up in my bedroom with the speakers that I have in there. Normally, I run them as a "B" set of speakers off of the main amp in the living room, but that leaves me without the ability to do things like choose music and adjust volume, both of which are handy things.

The Speakers


These speakers started out being a pair of big Technics with 8" woofers. They were a fun speaker, but not really an audiophile-quality one, so at some point when someone posted to the NHT message board that he was selling a pair of their classic SuperOne speakers, I offered to buy them. And I was too late. But the seller noted that OneCall, one of NHT's few authorized internet retailers, had SuperZeroes on clearance for $130 per pair.

Sadly, they were the "Xu" version, in plastic cabinets instead of their standard piano black-painted fiberboard. But hey, the sound would still be there. The SuperZero is really a classic loudspeeker, giving unbelievably good sound for their original 1993 retail price of $230 (and Corey Greenberg's review in Stereophile of the SuperZeroes is really a classic bit of audiophile literature). Of course there has to be a catch; with their small 4" woofers and sealed cabinet design (I'll explain that one in another post), they don't put much bass out. Well, really, they don't put any bass out.

So after I got them and set them up and realized I couldn't exactly handle that (I like a realistic amount of bass), I posted again on NHT's board looking for an inexpensive (under $300) subwoofer, and, as luck would have it, "Chip" was selling an NHT SW1P and matching amplifier/crossover for $175 or so, which was designed to mate with the SuperZeroes.

So, take the full range speaker signal from the B outputs of my receiver, run it through the crossover and then run the outputs to the sub and the speakers, and I had an amazingly kickass bedroom set of speakers for $300.

Back to the Receiver


So anyway, I switched the speakers from running off the main system to running off the Pioneer receiver. I hooked up my iPod to the inputs on the back of the 30-year-old receiver (hah!) powered it up, and pulled up some Okkervil River (a favorite for audio testing).

Holy shit did it sound good! That old receiver was amazing. Everything was nice. I took a look at the model number on the front panel; it was a Pioneer SX-737. It was rated at 35 watts per channel, which must be a very honest rating because the SuperZeroes are a little power hungry and it drives them nicely.

So I decided to get a little work done on it. It's a beautiful piece of gear. Reminds me very much of a Kenwood that my parents owned when I was a kid, which I really wish they had kept. Anyway, I figured it was worth putting a little money into, and ultimately it was around $100. Couple that with my $300 in speakers and assorted gear, and I had an incredible system for a super cheap $400. There are crappy mini systems that cost that much! And this was something that I wouldn't be embarassed to have as my main stereo.

The Source


I suggested in my "Hi-Fi 101" post that you could toss the CD player, instead using the computer as a "transport" (something to supply the bits encoding the music on the CD) and read the music as files on a hard drive instead of tracks on a CD. There are advantages to this, such as taking multiple shots at getting an error-free stream of data off of the CD once rather than having to do it in real time, every time.

CD audio is large; a CD holds 800 MB. You can compress it to mp3 or another "lossy" format which removes data that you're not likely to hear (extreme frequencies and quiet things that get covered up by louder sounds, for example), but I find that best for non-critical listening, like in a car or in the background at home or work. For use on my hi-fi rig, I go with a lossless format (Apple Lossless), which simply removes redundancies in the music and, when it gets decoded to be played back, you get an exact copy of the original signal. You can cut out about 40% of the data that way, as opposed to 90% for an mp3. Sacrifices must be made.

Now, if you don't have your computer sitting next to your stereo, you can run a long cord (lame!) or, better, you can have something hooked up to your stereo that can wirelessly pull music off of your hard drive, decode any compression you've applied, and send the signal along to a DAC, or run it through its own DAC and send the analog signal on to your pre-amp.

Which is what I have. In the main system, it's accomplished by the Apple Airport Express. Basically, the AX is a wireless router which also acts as a wireless receiver for iTunes. iTunes does the heavy lifting, decoding mp3s and whatnot, but re-encoding in Apple Lossless to transmit over the air to the AX, which decodes this, and then outputs a digital or analog signal. It works well in that setting where I always have my laptop nearby.

I considered that option for my bedroom system. But I'd have to have a computer in my bedroom to choose songs and so forth, or would have to walk into the living room to do it. I could also just use an iPod, but that's lame, if for no other reason than that I have to dig it out of my bag and hook it up at bedtime when I want to listen to music.

Instead, there are things that do heavier lifting, such as the Roku Soundbridge and the Slim Devices Squeezebox. These also pull music over your wireless network, but give you an interface for browsing and choosing songs, and can also decode any compression you may have.

The Roku can act as a client for iTunes' built-in music sharing, which is a nice, simple solution. Plus it could read Apple Lossless natively—when the player can't read a format natively, the computer has to translate it into a format the player can read before sending it over the network, which introduces its own set of problems. Plus, it was $150 (on sale), half the price of the $300 Squeezebox.

So I ordered and bought the Roku, and while I like the product a lot, it relies on the older, slower 802.11b wireless networking. This has a maximum throughput of 12 megabits per second, much higher than the 600 or so kilobits per second that losslessly compressed audio requires, but the Roku just could hack it, and I got very frequent skips in the music when the player couldn't get the data fast enough. This is, frankly, unworkable and inexcusable. So back it went. Plus, Stereophile's review of the Roku found some major design flaws in things from an audio perspective.

And instead, I ponied up for the Squeezebox. The Squeezebox relies on its own server software run on the computer, which is open source and quite flexible. It adds a layer of complexity but also means there are a ton of things that I can configure to my perspective. For example, El Ten Eleven: do they get filed under "El" or under "Ten"? It's my choice.

The Squeezebox doesn't decode Apple Lossless natively, but the transcoding works quite well, only using 5% of my CPU time. Only thing is you can't fastforward and rewind within tracks, just skip from one to the next or previous. The Squeezebox also has a far better DAC built in (so says Stereophile), which is important when you use the analog outputs since your 30-year-old receiver was around before the days of digital audio.

There was one more issue. I can pick music via remote control, but the Pioneer has no remote control, so no volume control... on the receiver. The Squeezebox has a volume control, though. It's not ideal, as it's done digitally, which means that some low level musical detail can be lost, but if I'm in bed going to sleep, I can handle that to have the option of adjusting the volume from the comfort of my pillow.

Conclusion


So there you go. A wonderful stereo at $100 of work on a free receiver, $300 worth of speakers and associated electronics, and then a splurge of a $300 networked music player. I'm super proud of it. Now if only that backlight in the receiver had a dimmer...

Labels: , ,



Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Will's birthday; New toy; Seminars, drinking, cigars; Half Nelson

2/27

So. About six months prior Will's green iPod mini got swiped out of his lab (he thinks by a scruffy looking college student that had a temporary position). I decided that nobody who has lived with an iPod should have to go back to living without one, so for his birthday I endeavored to gather a group of people to buy Will a new iPod.

After some exploratory fundraising, aided by Char, I settled on a 4 GB nano, the same size as his previous iPod, again in green. Which is what I was doing at Best Buy the previous saturday.

So I got everyone that contributed and could join us together at Woodrow's, and somebody made sure to get Will there. While we were waiting we let everybody sign a card.

Leroy had picked up a miniature Spider-Man lunch box which we were going to present to Will as his "present" with the iPod hidden inside.

In the end we managed to genuinely surprise him, and he was appropriately thankful. I was glad to have organized such a fun favor for a friend, and was excited about getting back to giving Will good music.

2/28

Will needed to fill up his iPod, so I hitched a ride with him. We decided to make an evening of it and started by hitting the comic store, then grabbing dinner (the traditional Double Dave's), and then back to my place to get that iPod filled up.

3/1

Somebody had been working on putting together a med center-wide happy hour for the students, but whoever planned them must not have been a grad student, because they didn't realize that to get grad students to come to things, you need cheap drinks and free food. The happy hour was held at the overly fancy Trevisio's on the top floor of a med center building, and featured the usual in lame appetizers (crackers, cheese, fruit tray, vegetable tray), and $4 beers. An assortment of people from the lab went, and I decided to go too, using the opportunity to sneak out of lab early to also catch the early bus home so that I could retrieve my new networked digital music player that had been delivered (see previous post about my bedroom system).

I had just enough time to get it up and running before Cindy and I went to meet Shawn and Sabrina at Spaghetti Western, where I'd been once before with Lauren. Three of us started with a round of margaritas (decent, though I might opt for the additional amaretto floater next time), while Shawn had a beer. We ordered some cheese bread for an appetizer, which is hard to mess up, but that's not to say it wasn't enjoyable. For my entree I selected the tombstone chicken, a grilled chicken breast held vertically by being wedged between two pieces of eggplant parmesan, topped with greens and sauced with marinara and their chipotle alfredo. Clever plating, and tasty. I think I talked Cindy into the Italian enchiladas; always good.

3/2

Drunk early, dinner, cigars
Will and I headed over to Rice for a physics talk. It was some interesting culture shock; everything was, dare I say, much more scientific than the usual biology talk. Of course I couldn't really keep up with the theory, but it was still an educational experience.

Afterwards I went to the usual Friday seminar while Will hung out at Valhalla, and then we started drinking the free after-seminar beer and chatted with Jeff and some professors. Will gave me a ride home, but we stopped off at the village for a beer... which became two... which became a trip across the street to Baker Street for more beer. Will went to retrieve his car from the garage while I walked over to the Briar Shoppe to pick up some cigars.

I got home and started sobering up, Cindy came over with some Chinese takeout, and after dinner we met up with Char and Angela for cigars and beer. It was a nice night, and we sat alone out on the other patio whose existence I was completely unaware of. All very pleasant.

3/3

Cindy and I decided to rent (or maybe borrow) a movie to watch, and ended up with Half Nelson. I guess it was competent enough, but it didn't leave much of an impression.

Labels: , , , , ,



Tuesday, June 05, 2007

An Ocean of Noise

There's a lot of new music that comes out. Some of it is even good. So how to deal with it all?

First, what to... obtain. I download before I buy these days; I've bought too many bad CDs to waste money on more. Plus if I wait, I can buy CDs when I see the artists in concert and they get more money that way.

So then since money isn't an issue, at least not in the short term, the limiting factor is time.

So, things I download: new releases by artists I like; things that Pitchfork recommends, if they sound appealing or if Pitchfork recommends them particularly vehemently; things that friends recommend; or old releases I've always meant to check out, back catalogs of artists I just got into, etc.

These things go on the list. The list started out on a post-it on my desk at work, where I get a lot of this listening done. Then it was several post-its, then I finally finished by moving to a Google spreadsheet, which I can handily access from whichever computer I happent to be close to. Which I admit is terrificly nerdy, but hell, this is all about being a music nerd.

The list used to be a fairly loose concept, and after I decided I'd become sufficiently familiar, I'd cross something off. A couple years back Lauren had suggested (not aware of my list) that five listens were sufficient to decide whether an album was your cup of tea or not.

Which is close to the truth. So I try to listen to each album 5 times. At that point, it gets cut loose. Either I come back to it and listen to it, or I forget about it. Maybe I'll pick it back up; maybe I won't.

If I listen to it frequently, I try to buy it. If not, well, wait and see.

As of now, there are 132 albums on the list. So it occurs to me that I probably won't listen to them all five times. That's OK. If something is so completely uncompelling that I can't even listen to it 5 times, I'll let it be and it can either wither or age on the vine. Maybe a couple of years from now I'll just throw it away. Maybe I'll come back to it.

This is why I have 10,590 songs in my main digital music library, 28 days worth of music, 50 GB. This is why I had to upgrade from an 80 GB hard drive to a 160 GB hard drive in my laptop, at great expense to... someone else.

It's far from a perfect system. I need to listen to more old stuff. But it can evolve freely, and does.

Labels: ,



Monday, June 04, 2007

Emotiva, the $1000 Stereo, and the $500 stereo

I stumbled upon this a couple weeks ago, but needed to get my big "Hi-Fi 101" post written first or this wouldn't have made any sense.

So I was following up on a namedrop on one of my most frequent audiophile hangouts about an internet stereo electronics company, Emotiva.

Their stuff seems to be quite good. Quality components, realistic power ratings, nice looking, etc. Although sadly, recently when I was asked to recommend some stereo equipment to somebody looking to put together a $1000 system (a nice sweet spot), they didn't have a ~$400 integrated amplifier or receiver for me to recommend, they did have this neat little thing, the BPA-1.

Although I haven't heard it and can't comment definitively, this seems to be an absolutely wonderful project.

You see, the nice thing about stereo components is that, since they're reasonably modular, you can buy a system in bits and pieces, particularly if you start with used or just plain cheap gear to make your initial system, and then upgrade it a piece at a time.

The problem is that if you buy gear that's, say, cheap enough to put together a $500 system, you end up with crap that you're going to throw out, or if you put together a $1000 system and want to expand, you may end up wasting a decent thing.

Let's look at how this little guy, the BPA-1 (shame they didn't give it a cute little name to go with its appearance), avoids that problem.

You want a cheap system. We'll ignore the question of a source; everybody has an iPod, a DVD player, or a computer. Worst comes to worst, you go buy that $30 portable CD player from Wal-Mart; it'll get the job done. It's the least important part of the chain because it's the easiest to do passably.

You buy a cheap but good set of speakers, say, the PSB Alpha B1, carried by my wonderful dealer and recently glowingly reviewed in Stereophile.

They're $279; we'll round up to $300. That leaves us with $200 left in the budget. To get a decent stereo amp that will last you, you could get, say, an NAD C320BEE ($400) or a Cambridge Audio Azur 540A ($500). Either way you're over budget.

Or you could buy the Emotiva, for $180. It's a stereo integrated amp. So that plus speakers plus a source, and you have a system for $460. You're $40 underbudget, which is enough to cover tax, shipping, cables, something along that line.

Now you sacrifice a few things. There's no remote control. It only takes one source. In this age of mp3 players, for a stereo that exists purely to play music, you only need one source. And get up off the couch to change the volume; it'll do you good not to be so lazy. Or get a source with volume control (again, mp3 player, with a really long set of interconnects or a remote control).

Maybe you want more power. You can buy a new integrated amp or receiver, and this little amp could find a nice home in a second system, or biamp your speakers (sepparate amplifier channels for low and high frequency drivers). Or add a passive subwoofer and use this to drive it; it has a built-in low pass filter!

Or just buy a preamp, and use two of these things to drive your speakers. You can run them as monoblock amps (two mono amps), or use four channels of amplification to biamp your speakers.

So in summary, one tremendously flexible piece of gear that is a:
  • Stereo integrated amp
  • Stereo power amp (with adjustable gain)
  • Monoblock power amp
  • Subwoofer amp
So nifty. I want one and I don't have a use for it yet. It'd be perfect for my bedroom system, if I didn't already have the vintage receiver. Or it'd be great for an office system. Or a new subwoofer amp if my sub ever goes out. Or if I ever get around to getting a starter system for Cindy.

So. Cool.

Labels: , ,



Sunday, June 03, 2007

Lab meeting and new toy; BBQ; Vinyl Edge and Jana Hunter

2/5

Did the lab meeting thing. I had new data which covered up any inadequacies in my presentation quite nicely.

Took off early to get home and grab my new toy, a Roku Soundbridge M1001. Of course, it ended up not really working. But more on that later.

Later: Cindy, TV, and Dan DJs at the Prole.

2/8

Once I had, new toy in hand, listened for a while to the receiver that Oliver had given to me, I noticed the right channel going in and out, and after confirming that the problem did not lie with my speakers or my subwoofer crossover/amp, I decided that I liked the receiver well enough to see about getting it cleaned, etc. At least I thought that was what it needed. Some of the switches made some noise when they were flipped, so I figured that was what it needed. And the backlighting seemed to be dim in one place.

So I first called up the one stereo store in town that I had any amount of faith in, Audio Concepts, who had previously been very nice about showing me some Magnepans and some Vandersteens (speakers). I asked if they did service or could refer me to someone. After telling them about the vintage Pioneer receiver, they referred me to somebody that did warranty work for Pioneer gear.

They were assholes. "Well, we don't have time to be wasting on old gear, so we'll do it when we can get to it, and it'll probabaly cost $400." Fuck you, you pretentious dicks.

So, on to polling through the "TV and radio repair" (how quaint!) section of Citysearch. I made about 20 calls. There was "no, we don't do that". There was "yes, we can do that; is it under warranty"—I said it was from 1974; your asking if it's under warranty clearly shows that you were not listening, or that you're an idiot, neither of which results in you getting my business. There was "yes, we can probably do that". And finally, there were two "Don't those old Pioneers sound great? We'll go over it with a fine tooth comb. All we do is service, so we want to earn your business." Bingo. One was west of the loop and the other was in Clearlake; and so I went with the one that was closer, Houston Audio Video.

Anyway, once I had found a place, I took Thursday morning and drove out and dropped it off to be, hopefully, well cared for.

Over Christmas, Dad, Becca and I had smoked some more ribs. We backed off on the rub too much, and they weren't quite as good, but that's nothing that heating them up slow in the oven drenched in BBQ sauce wouldn't fixed.

So to enjoy that, Cindy came over and she made potato salad and I made baked beans, and we had a nice little BBQ dinner together.

After that, a little trip up to Woodrow's to meet some people for some beer.

2/9

Got a ride with Char to seminar. At Rice, all visitor parking is paid, and fairly steep at that. However, there seems to be some sort of understanding that you can park along the interior streets, if you leave your emergency flashers on. I'd certainly done it before, and Char was in the habit of doing it for Keck.

Except he forgot to turn his flashers on. So when we got out, he had a ticket. Under the comments section, "no flashers". That's right. Flashers equals no ticket; no flashers equals ticket. There's some kind of internal logic there, but nothing that can really be considered logic in the strict sense of the word.

2/10

Detour to Vinyl Edge; Jana @ Rudz

Despite the fact that Susan and Jerry had warned me against going there after dark, I took the jaunt from their place over to Vinyl Edge not too far east of them, which Cindy insisted was perfectly safe. And, well, it was.

Anyway, the point to this excercise was to buy a few concert tickets without the service fee. But I checked out the shop while I was there. Small place, lots and lots of records, a lot of which weren't really... organized. If I was a real record collector, I could imagine the place being very exciting. Still, interesting to check out, and mission accomplished.

Afterwards, Cindy and I went up to Rudyard's to see Jana Hunter play. She seemed glad to see us there, but quite nervous: when onstage, "I like it when you guys are quiet. It makes it feel like I'm not performing for an audience". Anyway, good show.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,



Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Hi-Fi 101

If I'm going to follow up on my promise to start posting more stuff about my interests, you're all going to have to learn a bit about hi-fi. I'll try to make this as painless as possible.

Source


Let's start with a CD. You all know CDs, right? Shiny little things that used to be all the rage ten years ago? So CDs store a bunch of songs in digital form. Let's go through the process of turning those bits on the CD into music, and in doing so take a tour of hi-fi equipment.

So, the CD has to go into something, right? You think immediately of a CD player, of course, but a CD player actually consists of a couple parts that can be purchased sepparately.

The first is the transport. It's the mechanical part, including the motor and the laser, that pulls the data from the CD.

A transport can output the digital signal straight to a digital to analog converter (DAC), which produces the corresponding analog signal.

This is electrical current that rises and falls with the peaks and dips of the sound wave it represents. Actually, you have two signals, one for the left channel and one for the right channel. They go out over interconnects, often called RCA cables because of the most popular type of connector, those round thingies with a little metal tip sticking out that are usually color coded red and white, with red representing the right channel and white representing the left.

Amplification


The interconnects carry this line-level signal to a pre-amp. A pre-amp usually has a bunch of sources besides a CD player hooked up to it, and allows you to pick which one you want to listen to without haveing to unplug and replug the interconnects for different sources when you want to listen to a different piece of equipment.

The pre-amp takes the analog signal from the selected source (still the DAC of the CD player), and does something else useful, which is to allow you to change the volume of the signal, by amplifying or reducing the volume of the signal.

But the electrical signal at this point is still very low power. It takes quite a bit of energy to make enough sound to fill up a room, so the pre-amp outputs this volume adjusted signal, using another set of our old friend, the interconnect, to send the signal on to a power amplifier.

The power amplifier ups the energy of the signal significantly. Exactly how much depends on the particular amp you're using, but we'll assume here it's, well, enough.

Speakers


Enough for what? Follow the electrical signal along 2 wires (speaker cables) to a pair of loudspeakers. The electrical signal hits a magnet, which makes the speaker cone vibrate at the frequency and amplitude (pitch and volume) conveyed by the signal.

Now the tricky thing with speakers is that small speakers don't handle bass well, and large speakers don't handle treble well. So what you see most of the time (unless your speakers are cheap or you're into the really weird shit) is a speaker incorporating multiple drivers of varying sizes that cover different frequency ranges. To make sure each one only produces the frequencies in the appropriate range, you use a crossover to apply a high pass filter (high frequencies "pass" through) to the smaller speaker and a low pass filter (you can figure that one out) to the larger speaker.

Generally the smaller speaker is called a "tweeter" and the larger speaker is a "woofer", a perhaps overly clever bit of onomatopoeia . A speaker with one tweeter (.75-1" in diameter is pretty normal) and one woofer (4-6.5" diameter) is called a 2-way speaker, one with a tweeter, a "mid woofer", and a subwoofer (8, 10, or 12", commonly) is a 3-way speaker, as is a design that uses a tweeter, a "mid-treble driver", and a woofer. If you have one tweeter and two woofers of the same size, it's called a 2.5-way speaker, and so forth.

Combinations


So we've covered the following parts so far:
  • CD transport
  • DAC
  • Pre-amp
  • Power amp
  • Crossover
  • Loudspeaker
But we can combine some of these pieces into the same component.

For example, it's almost univeral, particularly in what you'd find at, say, Best Buy to see the CD transport and the DAC in one box, and the whole thing is your typical CD player. Actually, it's even more unviersal to just see a DVD player instead of a CD player, but the principle is the same.

It's also quite common to combine the pre-amp and the power amp into one box, which is called an integrated amp or integrated. Add a radio tuner to an integrated amp and you get a receiver, which is the most common for of amplification you'll see.

If a receiver can do more than 2 channels of amplification, and has a DAC which can decode surround sound, it's a home theater receiver. It's also common for an HTR to be able to switch video sources in addition to audio sources and pass the video on to a TV or monitor, so you don't have to change inputs on both the TV and the receiver.

Amplifiers that only amplify one channel of audio and are designed to be used in pairs (or more for a home theater system) are called monoblock amps. If two of these go in the same box, it's called a "dual-mono" design. If a stereo amplifier can be used as a monoblock amp, it's "bridgeable".

It's also pretty common to see CD players with digital audio outputs that let you bypass the built-in DAC and use a standalone one or one built into an HTR. This is because the DAC is usually the most expensive element in a nice CD player.

Some high-end CD players also acept digital inputs so that you can use their DACs for other sources. Some even have volume control so you don't need a pre-amp and can hook straight into a power amp.

If the amplifier is built into the speaker, the speaker is an active loudspeaker. Sometimes these even have their own source switching and volume control, as is common with computer speakers.

Another possibility is that you want to add a sepparate subwoofer to take over the bass duties normally handled by your main speakers. In this case you have an additional crossover which sends the very lowest frequencies to the amplifier that powers the subwoofer, and the higher frequencies to the speaker's own crossover. Subwoofer crossovers can be built in to an HTR (often referred to as bass management), an external box, or part of the subwoofer itself. Same for the amplifier, although you see it in the receiver only in cheap home-theater-in-a-box setups, and usually see it bolted to the back of the sub (a plate amp), or, occasionally, in its own box.

Now, imagine that instead of pulling bits off a CD using a transport, you pull them off a hard drive, and then send them on to a DAC. What you have is a digital music player that plays CD audio that just so happens to not be stored on CD. Essentially, you can do this running iTunes (or whatever software it is the infidels are using these days). Or instead of pulling the bits directly off a hard drive, the music player could even grab them off the network. Maybe you could even compress the CD audio using mp3 or something even better so it takes up less space on a hard drive. Wouldn't that be fancy...

So that gives you an overview of the basic parts of a stereo system, so the terminology won't be completely alien to you when I start throwing it around in future blog entries. Next time I'll talk about the equipment I have, and where my system stuff fits in to the schema described above, why I chose the gear I did, and what gear I ultimately aspire to own.

Labels: , , ,



Friday, April 20, 2007

Fancy meal, Christmas with Cindy; Phone and Cousin Jer; Preparations; Trip to Waco; Waco day 2; Christmas Eve

12/18

Pretty sure I spent a good deal of time wrapping Christmas Presents that night. It's not something I'm good at, and my choice of cheap wrapping paper combined with my neurotic perfectionist tendencies made it difficult.

12/19

So one thing I wanted to do with all my extra money was to take Cindy somewhere nice for dinner. And what better way to express your love than through vast quantities of grilled meat? With that in mind, we went to Nelore .

Thomas and I have previously gone to Fogo de Chao on a couple occasions, and I was certainly a big fan. Great meat and lots of it; expensive but worth every penny. When I saw, a while back, a review in the Houston Press of this place, and that its owner was a former employee of Fogo, and that it was a good $15 cheaper per-plate I started looking for an excuse to go, and now I had one.

First, the service was great. Very professional. Free valet, too. The building was cute, definitely cozier and more romantic than Fogo. The salad bar was likable, being less about salad and more about antipasto sorts of things. There were some side dishes available there too, stew sorts of things that I couldn't quite figure out how they fit in with the meal.

Everything was fine so far. But when we flipped our little coasters over to the "bring us meat" sides, disappointment ultimately came. The meat was overcooked, dry, and underseasoned. I wanted very much to like the place, but next time I'll spend the extra money and go to Fogo. Shame, that.

We returned to my place. There may have been some dessert. We definitely exchanged presents. I had given up on the waffle iron, particularly in the face of mounting evidence that her parents had probably gotten her one, and what I really wanted to get her was a bit out of budget. Instead, I got her a TV antenna so she could finally experience the HD part of her HDTV; an FM transmitter for her iPod so she could listen to it in her car (and, hopefully, to keep me from having to listen to talk radio and the same damn 10 scratched CDs she keeps in her car although that doesn't seem to have quite worked out); one of Found Magazine's compiled books, which I noticed she spent quite a bit of time looking at when we were at Dome a few weeks before; and trash bags. Nice trash bags with the diamond-patterned reinforcements and built-in drawstrings. She'd been envious of mine for quite some time, and so I bought them for her, mainly as a joke, although I like to think she's enjoyed using them, to the extent that one can enjoy trash bags (that aren't filled with some kind of gaseous narcotic).

As for what she got me, well, here it is. It was a very thoughtful gift, and she spent way more on me than she should have, and it's really a cool piece of equipment: a compact, portable turntable that can be battery operated, fit in a record crate, has a built-in speaker, and also audio outs for hooking up to my stereo.

Except that, as we all know, I'm horribly, horribly picky about my audio equipment. I'd probaly eventually have gotten around to getting my own turntable, probably for around 5x what this cost. And so I was kind of left with something that I didn't really want.

But I was good. I was very excited and appreciative and all that. There was no sense in being a dick about it. And it has been fun to have, because, really, I probably wouldn't have gotten around to buying a nice turntable for a long time. And it was a really nifty, thoughtful gift. Now I just have to come up with a good plan for how I'm going to explain buying a new one in a year or two...

Anyway, all in all, it was a nice little "date night".

12/20

Cousin Jer was in town for a visit, so I figured I'd try to catch up with him. Also, my brand new phone finally arrived. I forestalled Cousin Jer time to get the phone set up, only to discover, upon removing it from its packaging, that a screw was missing. Which was very disappointing. It completely screwed up my plan of getting to try out the phone for a couple of days and get my number ported over before going to Waco. And I didn't know quite what to do. Try to find a screw? Call Amazon? Call T-mobile? It was complicated.

Anyway, I put that aside and had to deal with the inconvenience of going to pick Jer up from out in BFE, and brought him back out here, knowing I'd have to return him at some point. I was a bit put off by the situation, but we ended up having a good time. We went to check out Two Rows for dollar beer night (and I think ran into some people), and then, when it got to be closing time, headed to Woodrow's.

Taking Jer out in Houston is always fun, if for no other reason than that he's appreciative of the embarassment of riches we have in the way of attractive women. I guess living in the midwest does that to a man. There was one girl at Woodrow's, who had apparently been scammed into a double date with her friend's boyfriend's friend and was not at all happy with it, so she decided to hit on Jerry instead. First she asked for his number, and then wrote her number on a receipt after he bought her a drink. I never really get how he does it... Anyway, all in all it was a good time.

12/21

Jer stayed over and I ended up taking back home the next day. I gave up on my idea of leaving for Waco that day, as I hadn't packed and still had this whole phone issue to deal with. Instead, I made the long round trip of taking him home. While in the car, the girl from the previous night called him. They ended up going out a few times over the holiday, apparently. Susan and Uncle Jerry apparently liked the girl, though they were a bit disturbed knowing that they had met in a bar (apparently that's a foreign concept to them). Jerry ultimately couldn't commit to anything, living out of state as he does, and somehow this is all my fault (according to Susan), because they met because of me.

So anyway, back at the apartment, I did some packing and started making calls about my new phone. Amazon actually has really good phone service, once you find their number. They agreed to ship me one next day, and even rerouted it to Waco. Except it didn't ship out the same day, but instead on Friday, and then with the weekend and the holiday it didn't show up until the next week. But it turns out that T-mobile reception at the house in Waco is crap, so I ended up not activating the phone until I headed back to Houston the following week anyway.

I got a little Zelda time in that night and got to hang out with Cindy, too.

12/22

Got on the road to Waco early afternoon. The goal was to make it back to Waco in time for John Mark Hoffman's (friend of the family) surprise birthday party at Poppa Rollo's. Got there the same time as Dad, somehow. Spent good time with Mom and Dad. Ate pizza. Made awkward small talk with some of Mom and Dad's church friends from our First Methodist days. In retrospect, wished I had ordered a beer.

After that, home, Becca showed up, and we had some good family time.

12/23

Having a hard time remembering specifics. I don't think I caught up with the guys, as David wasn't in town yet and Thom was out at his parents' place in Groesbeck. Actually, I think the Hoffmans came over and exchanged presents with us. They very nicely got me both the Sufjan Stevens Christmas boxed set, and the import-only Okkervil River tour EP I'd been really wanting. Sweet.

12/24

Christmas Eve. We took some food and things out to our former maid's apartment, as we do every year. Went to church for Christmas Eve service. Dinner at Ninfa's, which has become a tradition. Had their great chicken breast/cheese/butter/rice/ham/white wine dish. Drove around looking at Christmas lights. Got a little sick later from too much rich food. Despite that, enjoyed my absolute favorite time of the year.

Labels: , , ,



Friday, December 22, 2006

HD & Hans'; Poison Girl, Cecil's, & Beba's; Game and Hans'

9/6/06

I went into work a bit late so that I would have time to swing by Time Warner and swap my cable box out for one with HD capability. The swap was free, the service was free; it was nice all around. Got the box home, hooked it up, and had beautiful, glorious HD.

Met up with Char that night at Hans'. Cindy and/or Will may have also been there. Cigars of some kind might have been smoked.

9/8/06

Met up with Dan, Kristin, etc. at Poison Girl for drinks. I believe this is the night that their special combination of ginger beer and whiskey caught my eye, and it was pretty tasty. Afterwards, to Cecil's for more beer, and then food at Beba's to round out the evening. I need to find something else to get there; the gyros just aren't that good.

9/9/06

Char hosted a viewing of the UT/Ohio State rematch, complete with food, drink, and a projector. Good times. Another visit to Hans' after that, probably including bocce ball

9/10/06

Disturbingly, the HDMI (digital video) cable I had used to hook up my cable box to my TV stopped working over night, and I couldn't and still haven't gotten it to work. Even trying a different cable and various combinations of powering up the various pieces of electronics don't seem to make a difference. I've been making do with a component video connection, which is serviceable, but the problem has continued to vex me.

I also wanted to finalize my TV setup. The TV moved to the back of the TV stand, first tried on cinder bocks (too high), then one cement paver (too low), then two (close). It's not ideal, but it allows the TV to clear the center channel speaker when it's placed at the front of the stand. I'm not convinced it sounds quite as good there as it did on top of the old TV, but hey, sacrifices, am I right?

Labels: , ,



Monday, October 23, 2006

Happy iPod Day

Five years since the introduction of the iPod. I didn't quite get it at first, but after watching the demo on Apple's web site, I realized that they were doing two things: a player with the sotrage of a hard drive-based player but the size of a flash player, thanks to new 1.8" hard drive technology (had I considered the usefulness of PCMCIA-sized hard drives before then? maybe...); and the versatility and organizational prowess of the database-driven iTunes interface (music geeks really love organaziation; witness the monologue in High Fidelity on the subject).

A new control scheme, the scroll wheel, was introduced to make the most of the interface. As a plus, thanks to Apple's FireWire standard (USB 2.0 not yet available), there were quick file transfers. There were more subtle innovations, such as the use of a large RAM buffer which meant that the hard drive didn't have to run constantly and that battery life increased from the typical 3 hours for a HD player to 10 hours. There were what must have been fan-service touches, too: the use of the old MacOS system font Chicago for the iPod's interface, and the emphasis on a high-quality monochrome display (a selling point of the original Mac). There were some less-desirable touches reminiscent of the original Mac, too: the high price and "closed box" design.

It was six months before I saw one in the Apple Store in Dallas, and I had to quickly fight the impulse to pull out my credit card right then and there and pay what was then a very large amount of money for me. A clearance Rio 600 (then made by SonicBlue) tided me over, but within a year the price of the iPod had fallen, and combined with student discounts, it made a good Christmas present. It kept me supplied with music all throughout that spring semester at school and through grad school interviews.

It's good that I decided not to get it engraved, because within six months the third generation was released, slimmer and with those nifty touch-sensitive buttons. I talked Nick into buying my barely-used first generation model and traded on up. That one stayed with me through Europe, through lab rotations, long walks to and from Rice, bus rides, and trips to visit Rachal.

Then, a year later, I got a fourth generation model free with my laptop and passed the 3G model on to Lisa. That one got me through quals.

Six months later the Shuffle model was released and seemed like a nice (relatievly) cheap model for me to use in my car, and served well until the release of the Nano six months later, whose larger size, display, and full iPod interface were what I had really wanted all along. I passed the Shuffle on to an internet friend who is probably using it around Thailand and picked up a nano.

Then the new nano was introduced a few weeks ago and fixed a few things I didn't like about the one I had (small capacity and scratchability), so I found a buyer (Angela) and traded up once again to the more capacious and durable new model.

So, five years and six iPods later (yes, I do admit that I have a problem), it's hard to imagine being without one. I can't remember the last time I actually put a CD in my CD player (actually, probably when I had a rental car six months ago). The iPod is a great example of a small, modest technological advancement making life definitively better. Its slow ascent to it current huge popularity almost obscures the modesty of the device itself, but the technology is simple, it's just the execution that makes it worthwhile.

Thanks Steve, and Jonathan, and the rest of Apple for making something that makes a music lover love music even more.

Labels: , , ,